Reporting Research

Notice: This website is online only as an archive & a resource, as Panos London is no longer active.

For more information on the active Panos network and what Panos London achieved visit panos.org.uk.

Reflections from the Relay team meeting – Annie Hoban

Annie Hoban, Relay Programme Manager, speaks about what she considers as the most significant change in this phase of the Relay project:

 

New contacts and relationships between journalists and researchers, changed attitudes, increased motivations, career development, improved reporting of research on development issues, comments from readers, reactions from government officials…examples of all of these outcomes were shared by the Relay project team today as a result of Relay’s recent work in Uganda, Kenya and Northeast India.

After the first day of our 3-day team meeting here in Istanbul, I am enthusiastic about what we have achieved in a short space of time!  My hope for the next two days is that we can work toward packaging the stories of change, insights and lessons learned so we can share these with the project stakeholders and our partners and colleagues more widely.

For me, the most significant change in this phase of the Relay project is the increased enthusiasm and appreciation for monitoring and evaluation amongst the project team (and what we have accomplished with these new approaches and tools as a result).

At our 2010 team strategy meeting, the mention of M&E was met with groans.  I think it was seen at best as a reporting burden, and at worst, a diversion of resources away from project delivery to beneficiaries.

Today, I heard the team singing the praises of M&E, and regularly citing information captured using new M&E tools and approaches!

  • Wahida Rohman, Programme Associate with for Relay in Northeast India said working on the media scan and content analysis (using a new content assessment tool) was the most rewarding experience for her and that she learned a lot.  She confidently shared findings from the assessment as evidence for improved research reporting, and used the information to explain the wider context of media coverage of the dams issue.  She said one of the researchers involved in the project (Dr. Sanjay Borah) was also using the result of the media scan to inform his work.
  • Maureen Ndahura, Research Assistant for Relay in Uganda, shared that after using the spectrum lines evaluation tool at a Relay workshop to benchmark journalists and researchers interactions and attitudes of one another, they were invited to the Uganda Health Journalists Union conference, to share this and other M&E tools with more than 100 Ugandan health journalists.  Maureen recommended we share the findings of the media scan and content assessment more widely with editors, researchers, and the public.
  • Rahma Hassan, Research Assistant for Relay in Kenya shared a most significant change story about a journalist fellow who improved tremendously as a result of his work with Relay.  In telling the story, she used baseline information from the spectrum line exercise, in which the journalist initially reported hostility toward researchers.  She used the language and indicators of progress makers to describe a number of changes in behavior she observed that matched with those identified by project participants that they would ‘expect, like and love’ to see happen as a result of the project.

I think an important factor was the work the teams did with the support of an M&E facilitator at the outset of the project to better conceptualise the project’s logic and ‘theory of change’, which helped clarify where Relay’s interventions could have a measurable impact, and focus on practical and participatory M&E tools could be used to capture this.

I couldn’t have imagined in 2010 that the team would be so quick to adopt these new M&E tools and to use them and even share them more widely!

 

Lucy Atim (PEA), Rahma Hassan (PEA) and Arup Jyoti Das (PSA) are discussing M&E tools

Comments are closed.